Their phone only buzzes with work, bills and deliveries.

The thinking behind Be Open

On synchronicity

The psychiatrist Carl Jung coined the word "synchronicity" for coincidences that feel meaningful even though nothing seems to have caused them. He developed the idea over decades and set it out in a 1952 essay, published alongside the physicist Wolfgang Pauli. His best-known example came from his own consulting room: a patient was describing a dream about a golden scarab when a beetle very like one tapped at the window.

Psychology offers more than one way to look at moments like that. One view is that our minds are built to find patterns, and once something matters to us we start noticing it everywhere. Another, Jung's, is that some coincidences carry meaning because of what they connect inside us, whatever their cause. Researchers who study coincidence report that they are common, that people notice them most at times of change or uncertainty, and that many people find them steadying rather than strange.

Be Open doesn't ask you to decide which view is right. It simply puts a small, unexpected message into your day and leaves room for the moment it arrives to mean something, or nothing at all.

A gentler use for a powerful tool

Most of what we hear about artificial intelligence right now is about what it might take from us: jobs, attention, trust, even safety, as it's built into weapons and used to flood us with noise. Those concerns are real, and Be Open doesn't pretend otherwise.

But the same tools can be pointed somewhere else. People have always used structured practices to reach past everyday thinking: journals, meditation, the I Ching, dream work. Be Open is a small experiment in using AI that way, as a tool for noticing rather than for selling, persuading or replacing. It asks for none of your attention except for the few seconds it takes to read a line of text. It has no feed, no app and nothing to scroll.

We think that is a better direction for this technology, and a useful thing to try while the bigger questions are being argued out.

What the AI actually does

1. A true random draw. Each message begins with a value from a public randomness beacon run by an international group of universities and companies. Anyone can check that value afterwards, and no one, including us, can choose it.
2. A blind session. The random value picks three seed words and a reference number. An AI then works through a short session inspired by the physicist Thomas Campbell's work on consciousness and intent, and by the structure of remote viewing. It sets a caring intent, writes down raw impressions such as textures, colours and movement, puts aside any interpretation that jumps in, and only then shapes a message and chooses the part of the day it should arrive. Some messages invite you to notice something; others try to bring back a wider view of whatever you are turning over, the original purpose of remote viewing.
3. It never sees you. The AI is never given your name or number. The only thing it may know about you is a few words you chose to send us about what you're open to.
4. Careful checks. Every message is checked before it's sent: no predictions, nothing about health, money or loss, no links, nothing that reads like a greetings card. A separate check reads it again for anything that could worry someone.
5. An honest test. Some messages come from a simpler method instead, and no one is told which is which. Comparing how often each kind lands is how we find out whether the session makes any difference.

To be clear about what we don't know: an AI has no senses and no access to you. What we can say is that each message starts from a random moment, passes through a careful process, and is sent with good intent. Whether anything more happens is exactly what Be Open is trying to find out.

Open research

Every message that's sent, and whether it landed, becomes part of an anonymous record: the random value it came from, the session's impressions, the time it arrived, and whether someone replied. Names, numbers, replies and anything else about the people receiving the messages are never part of it. As the record grows we plan to share it openly, so that anyone interested in coincidence, intent and meaning can study it too.